Habermas was born in gummersbach, rhine province, in 1929. Critical commentaries on habermas have often treated the public sphere as a. This short work is their take on the interctions of democratic culture, political liberalism, religion and god. The debate was a dialogue between texts and followers. It does not deal with his older attempt at an epistemological justi.
His work addresses communicative rationality and the public sphere associated with the frankfurt school, habermass work focuses on the foundations of epistemology and social. The focus of this lecture is the habermas and ratzinger debate in munich, at the invitation of the catholic academy of bavaria, on january 19, 2004. Joseph cardinal ratzinger and jurgen habermas met in munich on the. The event was widely regarded as a conversation about the topic the prepolitical moral foundations of a liberal state. In terms of range and depth there is no one close to him. His diagnoses of contemporary society and concepts such as the public sphere, communicative rationality, and cosmopolitanism have influenced virtually all academic disciplines, spurred political debates, and shaped intellectual life in germany and beyond for more than fifty years. As i indicate below, habermas developed his study within the context of the. But habermas comes to this debate as much more than just a philosopher.
In the most recent publication by pope benedict xvi, which is actually a collection of interviews by peter seewald called light of the world, german philosopher jurgen habermas is mentioned once again. On reason and religion on free shipping on qualifying offers. Ratzinger, the will be pope benedict xvi, maintains that christianity plays decisive and significant role in the making of european culture. The present work does not examine all of habermass writings. Thus, adorno was ultimately able to bestow the crown of legitimate succession on the person who he thought was the most deserving and capable critical theorist wiggershaus 1996. In both he sees no less than the prototypes of a decisive dialogue in our day which will shape the future of our world p.
Gary habermas 12 minimal facts approach will helps us validate key events of the life of jesus. Contributors to the volume respond both to habermass ambitious and welldeveloped philosophical project and to his most recent work on religion. Once citizens act in my take on the habermas ratzinger debate. The rortyhabermas debate a companion to rorty wiley. Prepolitical foundations of the democratic constitutional state. Chapter 4 is a translation of einen unbedingten inn zu retten ohne gott, ist eitel. Jurgen habermas is one of the most influential philosophers of our time. Secularizing promotes focus on individual selfgain, yet this can go too extreme 1. A critical engagement with the regensburg lecture by francis mohan a thesis submitted to the university of birmingham for the degree of doctor of philosophy department of theology and religion school of philosophy, theology and religion college of arts and law university of birmingham. The habermasratzinger debate and its implications for europe. Foucault and habermas did not actually debate in person, though they were considering a formal one in the u. Habermas and religion calhoun, craig j habermas, jurgen. The editors have also contributed a substantial introduction outlining the central contours of habermass work and summarizing the main arguments of the essays. The debate between habermas and luhmann goes back to the end of the 1960sa time.
Justification and application remarks on discourse ethics. The major figure on the other side of this debate is jurgen habermas. In conside thre deeper presentatio o similaf n theme r i habermasns the theorys of. This thesis culminates with an examination of the appropriateness and applicability of habermas s theory of discourse ethics for the development of a contemporary christian ethic. Habermas and ratzinger dialectics of secularization notes. Abstract taking the use of the logos in ratzingers regensburg lecture as its starting point, the thesis expands three horizons in ratzinger studies. Two of the worlds great contemporary thinkerstheologian and churchman joseph ratzinger, now pope benedict xvi, and jrgen habermas, philosopher and neomarxist social criticdiscuss and debate aspects of secularization, and the role of reason and religion in a free society. Its author is jurgen habermas 1929, the german philosopher and sociologist who pertains to the second generation of the frankfurt philosophical circle. Teoria critica y estado social neokantismo y socialdemocracia en j. Habermas investigated both the ways that a new public sphere emerged during the time of the enlightenment and the american and french revolutions and how it promoted political discussion and debate.
The analysis of a fascinating habermasratzinger debate on the prepolitical moral foundations of the freestate suggests that while legitimacy originates on the will of the citizens that conform the political community, liberal democracies might not be. Over the last week i have been struggling to understand the basic architecture of german philosopher jurgen habermas, perhaps the most famous philosopher of his generation. Lessons from the jurgen habermas and joseph ratzinger debate, fellowship of catholic scholars quarterly, nos. The editors have also contributed a substantial introduction outlining the central contours of habermas s work and summarizing the main arguments of the essays. Like kant, habermas views faith as a complement to reason, not as its basis. Habermas argues that his speech disability made him think differently about the importance of deep dependence and of communication. Habermas essay, taking aim at the heart of the present 1984 was altered before release in order to account for foucaults inability to reply. The debate compares and evaluates the central ideas of habermas and foucault as they pertain to questions of power, reason, ethics. Key concepts barbara fultner a rare systematic thinker, habermas has furthered our understanding of modernity, social interaction and linguistic practice, societal institutions, rationality, morality, the law, globalization, and the role of religion in multicultural societies. Although it does not provide a comprehensive overview of every aspect of habermass critical theory, it does situate the idea of the public sphere, which occupied him early on in his career, in the context of subsequent developments in his thinking. A few phases can be distinguished in his intellectual and scientific development, namely, speculative.
Ratzinger had already used this formulation in books published in 1989 and 1991, well before the cdfs 1992 letter. Jan 29, 2011 sorry i only approved your comment now, and responded so late. Because when an exchange as habermas proposes really begins to take plac. Habermas warns about external threats to secular society. Habermas is a german philosopher the leading systematic philosopher of our time, richard rorty of the university of virginia calls him. The debate which later became a book, published in various languages both habermas and ratzinger like bockenforde before them. The developments in rortys position are pointed out, for example, his current acceptance of the epithet relativist against his earlier rejection of this self. The analysis of a fascinating habermasratzinger debate on the prepolitical moral foundations of the freestate suggests that while legitimacy originates on the will of the citizens that conform the political community, liberal democracies might not be completely free from moral principles implicit in their political culture. In both he sees no less than the prototypes of a decisive dialogue in. Habermas, 1981 kleine politische schriften, suhrkamp, frankfurt am main, p. The theory of communicative action belongs to the set of modern postmarxist theories.
Habermas stands as a symbol of continuity with the platonic tradition, which operates through dialogue, such as the ones conducted by socrates and reconstructed by plato. The essays in this book all of them published here for the first time provide. Habermas and ratzinger now benedict xvi are two of the greatest minds of their times. Firstly, it extends the understanding of ratzinger as the author of a logos theology. The result is a guide for those seeking to understand and build on an unfinished debate between two of the 20th centurys most important philosophers. Prepolitical foundations of the democratic constitutional. Religion and democracy in the thought of jurgen habermas. Jurgen habermas recognition of the postsecular has impacted the debate. Habermas ratzinger jurgen habermas pope benedict xvi. Habermas, ratzinger and the kantian divide creatio. Article information, pdf download for liberalism ex nihilo.
Jurgen habermas translated by thomas mccarthy beacon press boston. He was born with a cleft palate and had corrective surgery twice during childhood. On reason and religion joseph ratzinger, jurgen habermas on. This thesis will seek to determine whether habermass theory, called the theory of discourse ethics, is an ethical theory that is appropriate or applicable for use within.
Soon afterward, the disciples were discouraged, bereaved, and despondent, having lost hope. Habermas has put forth a communicativebased alternative to traditional forms of ethics that require recourse to history or tradition or to an authoritative document. Habermas, ratzinger and the kantian divide january 29, 2011 january 29, 2011 ricardo s. On reason and religion joseph ratzinger, jurgen habermas on free shipping on qualifying offers.
Two of the worlds great contemporary thinkers theologian and churchman joseph ratzinger, now pope benedict xvi, and jurgen habermas, philosopher and neomarxist social critic discuss and debate aspects of secularization, and the role of reason and religion in a free society. All quotations have been rendered in english by the. Ratzingers logos theology and the healing of human rights. Article information, pdf download for how religious is the public sphere.
Habermas and ratzinger on the future of religion ratzinger is the personi. In this chapter the debate between habermas and rorty on the issue of relativism is discussed critically. Habermas, the last great representative of the philosophical school of frankfurt and the esteemed counterpart of thencardinal ratzinger in the debate that took place in munich on january 19, 2004, revived the proposal for an alliance between enlightened reason, or the clarified consciousness of modernity, and the. In his thinking after the formal debates with luhmann, habermas has developed his thought in many ways. This is the full text of a chapter on the habermas rawls debate which was written as chapter 1 of the rouledeg companion to critical theory.
First, he grounds the necessity and authority of rules on the three speech claims of truth, truthfulness, and rightness. Contributors to the volume respond both to habermas s ambitious and welldeveloped philosophical project and to his most recent work on religion. Then, habermas s theory of discourse ethics is introduced and explicated. Habermas returned to frankfurt to take over horkheimers chair in philosophy and sociology. On these occasions i have also provided the reference to the original texts. For, on one hand, it is true that foucault is as we all must be, particularly 289 king. The article investigates the encounter between joseph cardinal ratzinger and jurgen habermas in munich 2004.
The debate between habermas and luhmann goes back to the end of the 1960sa time of extreme ideological confrontation in the fields of social science and philosophy. The book juxtaposes key texts from foucault and habermas. Get your kindle here, or download a free kindle reading app. For this english version i omitted those parts of my analysis of apels philosophy. Ratzinger rehearses the debate from the euthyphro on the.
On reason and religion joseph ratzinger, jurgen habermas on amazon. In this part of the paper, some of the basic insights of the habermas ratzinger dialogue habermas ratzinger 2005 will be cited, where both protagonists tend to answer the question in the same way. Studies in contemporary german social thought includes three essays that were published in erlauterungen zur diskursethik. And while ratzinger precisely dialogues with habermas because of what he advocates for, making the religious feel at home in the modern state, he will also say that this is inadequate or insufficient. Post secular we realize we have secularized too much, and we have lost some of the basic communal morality that derived from religion ie forgiveness, social programs, redemption, sense of communal help 1. In 2004 jurgen habermas and joseph ratzinger participated on a debate on the prepolitical moral foundations of a freestate. These two separate essays are the summation of a discussion between these two men. Restricting the growth of monetaryadministrative complexity is by no means. So we have to concentrate to this tradition as it follows the distinctive signature of habermas in the critical theory of society.
The human person is the event or being of relativity. Jan 19, 2019 habermas stands as a symbol of continuity with the platonic tradition, which operates through dialogue, such as the ones conducted by socrates and reconstructed by plato. Download pdf save cite this item table of contents. Communal values in the new hungarian fundamental law. For habermas, central to any philosophical activity is a setting he calls the ideal speech situation, and this habermasian notion brings us back to the discourse of. Thompson is a fellow of jesus college, cambridge, and david held is lecturer in politics, university of york. Habermas and ratzinger on the future of religion cambridge core. The book closes with an extended response from habermas itself a major statement from one of todays most important thinkers. Feb 19, 2011 i find it significant that habermas speaks about the sensitivity to the truth as a necessary element of the process of political argumentation, reinserting thus the concept of truth into the philosophical debate and into the political debate.
905 531 1268 1530 1214 295 1425 547 867 1245 1434 1050 180 1642 1046 34 1608 673 275 414 435 300 907 1555 123 531 1444 1446 1007 1166 1402 1316 890 1420 1119 664 794 635 939 848 250 1201 1064 866